CD4+ CAR-T cell exhaustion associated with early relapse of multiple myeloma after BCMA CAR-T cell therapy.

Multiple myeloma is characterized by frequent clinical relapses following conventional therapy. Recently, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has been established as a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. However, while >70% of patients initially respond to this treatment, clinical relapse and disease progression occur in most cases. Recent studies showed persistent expression of BCMA at the time of relapse, indicating that immune intrinsic mechanisms may contribute to this resistance. While there were no pre-existing T cell features associated with clinical outcomes, we found that patients with a durable response to CAR-T cell treatment had greater persistence of their CAR-T cells compared to patients with transient clinical responses. They also possessed a significantly higher proportion of CD8+ T effector memory cells. In contrast, patients with short-lived responses to treatment have increased frequencies of cytotoxic CD4+ CAR-T cells. These cells expand in vivo early after infusion but express exhaustion markers (HAVCR2 and TIGIT) and remain polyclonal. Finally, we demonstrate that non-classical monocytes are enriched in the myeloma niche and may induce CAR-T cell dysfunction through mechanisms that include TGFß. These findings shed new light on the role of cytotoxic CD4+ T cells in disease progression after CAR-T cell therapy.

Daratumumab-based quadruplet therapy for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high cytogenetic risk.

In the MASTER study (NCT03224507), daratumumab+carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) demonstrated promising efficacy in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), daratumumab+lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved outcomes for transplant-eligible NDMM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis of patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs; del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], or gain/amp[1q21]). Among 123 D-KRd patients, 43.1%, 37.4%, and 19.5% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Among 120 D-RVd patients, 55.8%, 28.3%, and 10.8% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Rates of complete response or better (best on study) for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs were 90.6%, 89.1%, and 70.8% for D-KRd, and 90.9%, 78.8%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. At median follow-up (MASTER, 31.1 months; GRIFFIN, 49.6 months for randomized patients/59.5 months for safety run-in patients), MRD-negativity rates as assessed by next-generation sequencing (10-5) were 80.0%, 86.4%, and 83.3% for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs for D-KRd, and 76.1%, 55.9%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. PFS was similar between studies and superior for 0 or 1 versus ≥2 HRCAs: 36-month PFS rates for D-KRd were 89.9%, 86.2%, and 52.4%, and 96.7%, 90.5%, and 53.5% for D-RVd. These data support the use of daratumumab-containing regimens for transplant-eligible NDMM with HCRAs; however, additional strategies are needed for ultra-high-risk disease (≥2 HRCAs). Video Abstract.

Health-related quality of life in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone: Patient-reported outcomes from GRIFFIN.

In the phase 2 GRIFFIN trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02874742), daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) alone in transplant-eligible (TE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module 20-item (QLQ-MY20), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) tools on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3; on day 21 of cycle 4 (end of induction therapy); on day 1 of cycle 5; on day 21 of cycle 6 (end of posttransplant consolidation therapy); and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of maintenance therapy. Meaningful improvements from baseline were seen in most of the PRO scales with both treatments after consolidation and were sustained for at least 2 years of maintenance treatment. Large reductions from baseline (~20 points) were especially observed in pain symptoms for both treatment groups, although these were numerically higher for patients receiving D-RVd during the majority of the time points. In addition, improvements in key scales, such as global health status, fatigue symptoms, and physical functioning, were also seen with both D-RVd and RVd. These improvements in health-related quality of life contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the improvement in clinical outcomes such as response rates and PFS with D-RVd in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy in TE patients with NDMM.

Salvage Therapies including Retreatment with BCMA-directed Approaches Following BCMA CAR-T Relapses for Multiple Myeloma.

For patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with relapse following B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T), optimal salvage treatment strategies remain unclear. BCMA-directed CAR-T and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are now commercially available, and the outcomes for retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches are not well-studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with relapsed disease after BCMA-directed CAR-T to evaluate outcomes and responses to salvage therapies. With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median overall survival from time of relapse until death was 18 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2 months-not reached (NR)). 58 patients received subsequent myeloma-directed therapies, with a total of 265 lines-of-therapy (LOTs). The overall response rate for first-line salvage therapy was 41% (CI: 28-55%). Among all LOTs, high response rates were observed among those receiving another BCMA-directed CAR-T (89%), BCMA-directed BsAb (60%), CD38-directed combinations (80% when combined with BsAb; 50% when combined with immunomodulatory drugs and/or proteasome inhibitors), and alkylator-combinations (50% overall; 69% with high-dose alkylators). Thirty-four patients received at least one line of salvage BCMA-directed therapy; median PFS was 8.3 months (CI: 7.9 months-NR), 3.6 months (CI: 1.4 months-NR), and 1 month (CI: 0.9 months-NR) with median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months, 4.4 months, and 2.8 months for subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T, BsAb, and belantamab mafadotin, respectively. Retreatment with BCMA-directed CAR-T and BsAb can be effective salvage options post-BCMA-directed CAR-T relapse; however, DORs appear limited and further studies with new combinations and alternative targets are warranted.

Outcomes of weight-based vs. fixed dose of Pembrolizumab among patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess outcomes among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received treatment with pembrolizumab on a weight-based dose (WBD) or fixed-dose (FD) regimen using a non-inferiority (NI) analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with NSCLC weighing under 100 kg who received pembrolizumab between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. Patients were grouped into either WBD or FD cohort based on the initial pembrolizumab dose and dosing regimen. The primary effectiveness outcome was overall survival (OS), analyzed using NI analysis with a lower margin of 10% comparing WBD to FD. Safety outcomes were all-cause emergency room visits or hospitalizations and incidence of selected immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and analyzed using NI analysis with an upper margin of 10%. All patients were followed until the end of health plan membership, death, or 30 June 2022, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: A total of 1413 patients were evaluated. OS was observed in 36.6% of the FD group, and 37.7% in the WBD group (rate difference: 1%, 90% CI: -6%-8%, NI p-value < 0.01). NI was met in all three safety outcomes: proportion of all-cause emergency room visits (rate difference: 1.1%, NI p-value < 0.01); proportion of hospitalizations (rate difference: 2%, NI p-value < 0.01); and composite incidence of irAEs (rate difference: -2.2%, NI p-value = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that WBD of pembrolizumab may be as appropriate as FD for the treatment of lung cancer.

Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) in the GRIFFIN study improved the stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the findings of the predefined final analysis. METHODS: GRIFFIN was an open-label, randomised, active-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 35 research centres in the USA. Patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with measurable disease by M protein or free light chain, were aged 18-70 years, had an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and were eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to four D-RVd or RVd induction cycles, autologous HSCT, two D-RVd or RVd consolidation cycles, and lenalidomide with or without daratumumab maintenance therapy for 2 years. Patients received 21-day cycles of oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-14), subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), oral dexamethasone (40 mg weekly) with or without intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg weekly, cycles 1-4; day 1, cycles 5-6). Maintenance therapy (28-day cycles) was oral lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg intravenously every 4 or 8 weeks, or 1800 mg subcutaneously monthly). Patients could continue lenalidomide maintenance after study treatment completion. The primary endpoint was stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in the response-evaluable population, and has already been reported. Here we report updated stringent complete response rates and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival and overall survival. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02874742) and ended on April 8, 2022. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2016, and April 10, 2018, 104 patients were randomly assigned to the D-RVd group and 103 were randomly assigned to the RVd group; most patients were White (85 [82%] in the D-RVd group and 76 [74%] in the RVd group) and male (58 [56%] in the D-RVd group and 60 [58%] in the RVd group). At a median follow-up of 49·6 months (IQR 47·4-52·1), D-RVd improved rates of stringent complete response (67 [67%] of 100] vs 47 [48%] of 98]; odds ratio 2·18 [95% CI 1·22-3·89], p=0·0079), and 4-year progression-free survival was 87·2% (95% CI 77·9-92·8) for D-RVd versus 70·0% (95% CI 55·9-80·3) for RVd, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·45 (95% CI 0·21-0·95, p=0·032) for risk of disease progression or death with D-RVd. Median overall survival was not reached for either group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·31-2·56], p=0·84). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the D-RVd versus RVd groups were neutropenia (46 [46%] of 99 vs 23 [23%] of 102), lymphopenia (23 [23%] vs 23 [23%]), leukopenia (17 [17%] vs eight [8%]), thrombocytopenia (16 [16%] vs nine [9%]), pneumonia (12 [12%] vs 14 [14%]), and hypophosphataemia (ten [10%] vs 11 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 46 (46%) of 99 patients in the D-RVd group and in 53 (52%) of 102 patients in the RVd group. One patient in each treatment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event that resulted in death (bronchopneumonia in the D-RVd group; cause unknown in the RVd group); neither was related to study treatment. No new safety concerns occurred with maintenance therapy. INTERPRETATION: Addition of daratumumab to RVd improved the depth of response and progression-free survival in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results justify further evaluation in phase 3 studies. FUNDING: Janssen Oncology.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cell/Myeloma Fusion Vaccine with Lenalidomide Maintenance after Upfront Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: BMT CTN 1401.

PURPOSE: Vaccination with dendritic cell (DC)/multiple myeloma (MM) fusions has been shown to induce the expansion of circulating multiple myeloma-reactive lymphocytes and consolidation of clinical response following autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial (NCT02728102), we assessed the effect of DC/MM fusion vaccination, GM-CSF, and lenalidomide maintenance as compared with control arms of GM-CSF and lenalidomide or lenalidomide maintenance alone on clinical response rates and induction of multiple myeloma-specific immunity at 1-year posttransplant. RESULTS: The study enrolled 203 patients, with 140 randomized posttransplantation. Vaccine production was successful in 63 of 68 patients. At 1 year, rates of CR were 52.9% (vaccine) and 50% (control; P = 0.37, 80% CI 44.5%, 61.3%, and 41.6%, 58.4%, respectively), and rates of VGPR or better were 85.3% (vaccine) and 77.8% (control; P = 0.2). Conversion to CR at 1 year was 34.8% (vaccine) and 27.3% (control; P = 0.4). Vaccination induced a statistically significant expansion of multiple myeloma-reactive T cells at 1 year compared with before vaccination (P = 0.024) and in contrast to the nonvaccine arm (P = 0.026). Single-cell transcriptomics revealed clonotypic expansion of activated CD8 cells and shared dominant clonotypes between patients at 1-year posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: DC/MM fusion vaccination with lenalidomide did not result in a statistically significant increase in CR rates at 1 year posttransplant but was associated with a significant increase in circulating multiple myeloma-reactive lymphocytes indicative of tumor-specific immunity. Site-specific production of a personalized cell therapy with centralized product characterization was effectively accomplished in the context of a multicenter cooperative group study. See related commentary by Qazilbash and Kwak, p. 4703.

Intensity of Cyclophosphamide-Based Bridging Therapy Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Myeloma.

Patients receiving autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) may require bridging therapy (BT) before CAR-T infusion to maintain some level of disease control. Alkylators, such as cyclophosphamide (Cy), are often used in regimens, either in high-intensity regimens, such as modified hyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), or once-weekly regimens, such as KCd (carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal BT alkylator dose intensity in MM. We performed a single-center analysis of all instances of BT before planned autologous CAR-T for MM during a 5-year period ending in April 2022. We classified bridging regimens into 3 cohorts: (1) hyperfractionated Cy (HyperCy) with inpatient Cy every 12 to 24 hours or as a continuous i.v. infusion; (2) less intensive Cy dosing (WeeklyCy), such as KCd; and (3) NonCy, in which no alkylators were used in BT. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related characteristics were collected for all patients. The 3 BT cohorts were compared using the Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and log-rank test, as appropriate. We identified 70 discrete BT instances among 64 unique patients, including 29 (41%) with HyperCy, 23 (33%) with WeeklyCy, and 18 (26%) with NonCy. The median total Cy dosing during BT in the 3 groups were 2100 mg/m2, 615 mg/m2, and 0 mg/m2, respectively. Age, number of prior lines of therapy, triple-class refractory status, presence of high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, bone marrow plasma cell burden, involved free light chain (iFLC) kinetics before collection, and other measures of disease aggressiveness were comparable across the 3 cohorts. iFLC levels rose ≥25% and ≥100 mg/L during BT (approximating progressive disease) in comparable proportions (P = .25) among the cohorts: 52% for HyperCy, 39% for WeeklyCy, and 28% for NonCy. All BT instances without subsequent CAR-T were due to manufacturing failures. Among 61 instances of BT followed by CAR-T, vein-to-vein times were slightly longer (P = .03) with HyperCy (45 days) compared with WeeklyCy (39 days) and NonCy (46.5 days). Neutrophil recovery times were similar in the 3 cohorts, but platelet recovery took longer with HyperCy (64 days) compared with WeeklyCy (42 days) and NonCy (12 days). Progression-free survival was comparable among the cohorts, but median overall survival (OS) was not: 15.3 months with HyperCy, versus 30.0 months with WeeklyCy and not reached with NonCy. In our retrospective analysis of BT before CAR-T therapy in MM, HyperCy did not result in superior disease control than WeeklyCy despite a 3-fold higher dose of Cy. In contrast, HyperCy was associated with longer post-CAR-T platelet recovery and worse OS despite comparable measurements of disease aggressiveness and tumor burden. Study limitations include our small sample size, as well as confounding from gestalt markers of MM aggressiveness that might have led to poorer outcomes as well as physicians' decision to prescribe HyperCy. Given the rarity of objective disease responses to chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory MM, our analysis suggests that hyperfractionated Cy regimens do not outperform once-weekly Cy regimens for most patients who require BT before CAR-T therapy.

Impact of bortezomib-based versus lenalidomide maintenance therapy on outcomes of patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression-free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard-risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib-based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT. METHODS: In total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel-agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib-based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib-based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high-risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p < .01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression-free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p = .009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: No superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post-transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Analysis of patient-reported experiences up to 2 years after receiving idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Longitudinal findings from the phase 2 KarMMa trial.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the long-term experience of patients receiving ide-cel chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the pivotal phase 2 KarMMa trial. METHODS: This qualitative study analyzed semi-structured patient interviews 6-24 months after ide-cel infusion. Thematic analysis with quantitative and longitudinal analyses explored patient perceptions of ide-cel treatment experience, advantages and disadvantages, and long-term health-related quality of life impact. Patient journeys were developed from narrative analysis of perceived treatment benefits with known remission length. RESULTS: Interviews with 45 patients 6-24 months postinfusion were analyzed; all reported ≥ 1 ide-cel treatment advantage, most often related to efficacy (n = 42/45, 93%), few or no side effects (n = 35/45, 78%), and avoidance of other treatments (n = 34/45, 76%). Patients generally reported 6-month improvements in physical health, functioning, emotional well-being, social life, and outlook on the future; these improvements mostly remained "stable" through 18 and 24 months. The most common patient journeys comprised physical, functioning, or emotional benefit with remission < 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal analysis of patient experiences showed sustained benefits and preference for ide-cel up to 24 months after treatment. Trial Registration Number and Date: NCT03361748. December 5, 2017.

Significance of the pee-value: relevance of 24-hour urine studies for patients with myeloma.

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria require refrigerated 24-hour urine specimens for most patients. However, given that serum free light chain testing has been shown to outperform 24-hour urine immunofixation as a prognostic marker, the importance of maintaining urine testing options or requirements within each level of IMWG response criteria has not been investigated. We analyzed responses to induction therapy for all transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma at our institution over a 3-year period using traditional versus 'urine-free' IMWG response criteria (where references to urine were removed from the descriptions for every depth of response). Of 281 evaluable patients, responses changed for only 4% of patients (95% confidence interval 2-7%) using urine-free criteria. Our results call into question the continued requirement for 24-hour urine measurements as part of IMWG response assessments for all patients. Research into the prognostic performance of urine-free IMWG criteria is ongoing.

Safety and Efficacy of BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Older Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Risks of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections. The efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy in the geriatric setting, including complications such as falls and delirium, which may be more prevalent in older patients, have not been fully analyzed. We wanted to analyze the efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy among older patients (age ≥70 at infusion) versus younger patients with MM. We analyzed all patients with MM who received any autologous BCMA CAR-T therapy over a 5-year period at our institution. Key endpoints included CRS, ICANS incidence, days to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery, incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 400 mg/dL), infections within 6 months, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 83 analyzed patients (age range 33-77), 22 (27%) were aged ≥70 at infusion. The older cohort had lower creatinine clearances (median 67.3 versus 91.9 mL/min, P < .001) and a higher proportion of patients with performance status ≥1 (59% versus 30%, P = .02) but were otherwise similar. Rates of any-grade CRS, any-grade ICANS, and days to ANC recovery were similar between groups. Rates of baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were 36% in older patients and 30% in younger patients (P = .60), whereas post-infusion hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in 82% versus 72%, respectively (P = .57). Infections occurred in 36% (n = 8) of the older cohort versus 52% (n = 32) of the younger cohort (P = .22). There were no statistically significant differences between the older and younger cohorts in terms of documented falls (9% versus 15%, P = .72) or non-ICANS delirium (5% versus 7%, P = 1.0). Median PFS was 13.1 months in older patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-not reached [NR]) versus 12.5 months in younger patients (95% CI 11.3-22.5, P = .42. Median OS was not reached in the older cohort (95% CI, NR-NR) versus 31.4 months in the younger cohort (95% CI, 24.8-NR) with P = .04. However, age ≥70 was not a significant predictor of OS after adjusting for high-risk cytogenetics, triple-class refractoriness, extramedullary disease, and bone marrow plasma cell burden. Although limited by small sample size and unmeasured confounders, our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate significant increases in CAR-T toxicity among older patients. This included toxicities associated with geriatric populations such as falls and delirium. Our paradoxical finding of borderline better OS among patients aged ≥70, which was not significant in regression modeling, may have been due to selection bias in favor of disproportionately healthy CAR-T candidates in the geriatric population. Overall, BCMA CAR-T remains a safe and effective option for older patients with MM.

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis.

Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by organ dysfunction, morbidity, and early mortality. Daratumumab in combination with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is now standard frontline AL therapy; however, not all patients are candidates for this intensive regimen. Given the potency of Daratumumab, we evaluated an alternative frontline regimen: daratumumab, bortezomib, and limited-duration dexamethasone (Dara-Vd). Over a 3 year period, we treated 21 patients with Dara-Vd. At baseline, all patients had cardiac and/or renal dysfunction, including 30% of patients with Mayo stage IIIB cardiac disease. Nineteen of 21 patients (90%) achieved a hematologic response with 38% achieving a complete response. The median time to response was 11 days. Ten of 15 (67%) evaluable patients achieved a cardiac response and 7 of 9 (78%) achieved a renal response. The 1-year overall survival was 76%. In untreated systemic AL amyloidosis, Dara-Vd produces rapid and deep hematologic and organ responses. Dara-Vd was well-tolerated and efficacious, even among patients with extensive cardiac dysfunction.

Impact of second primary malignancy post-autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis.

The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P < .001 and HR 5.01, P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P < .001 and HR 8.13, P < .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post-auto-HSCT.

Cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with improved responses to CD38 monoclonal antibody therapies in multiple myeloma: A single-centre retrospective study.

The CD38-targeting monoclonal antibodies (CD38 mAbs) are well-established therapies in multiple myeloma (MM), but responses to treatment are not always deep or durable. Natural killer (NK) cells deficient in Fc epsilon receptor gamma subunits, known as g-NK cells, are found in higher numbers among individuals exposed to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and are able to potentiate the efficacy of daratumumab in vivo. Here, we present a single-centre, retrospective analysis of 136 patients with MM with known CMV serostatus who received a regimen containing a CD38 mAb (93.4% daratumumab and 6.6% isatuximab). CMV seropositivity was associated with an increased overall response rate to treatment regimens containing a CD38 mAb (odds ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-6.02). However, CMV serostatus was associated with shorter time to treatment failure in a multivariate Cox model (7.8 vs. 8.8 months in the CMV-seropositive vs. CMV-seronegative groups respectively, log-rank p = 0.18, hazard ratio 1.98, 95% CI 1.25-3.12). Our data suggest that CMV seropositivity may predict better response to CD38 mAbs, although this did not correspond to longer time to treatment failure. Larger studies directly quantitating g-NK cells are required to fully understand their effect on CD38 mAb efficacy in MM.

Ethical Challenges with Multiple Myeloma BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Slot Allocation: A Multi-Institution Experience.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for patients with triple refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Real-world access to CAR-T therapy remains challenging owing to supply chain limitations impacting manufacturing. The goal of this study was to evaluate the extent of this issue and how major centers are handling the challenges of CAR-T manufacturing slot allocation. MM CAR-T physician leaders at each CAR-T treatment center across the United States were surveyed. We received responses from 17 of 20 centers. A median of 1 slot is allocated per month per center, and the median number of patients per center on the waitlist since the FDA's approval of idecabtagene vicleucel is 20 (range, 5 to 100). As a result, patients remain on the waitlist for a median of 6 months (range, 2 to 8 months) prior to leukapheresis. For patient selection, all centers reported using a committee of experienced CAR-T physicians to ensure consistency. To ensure transparency, 15 centers make selection criteria, selection timelines, and priority scores readily available for CAR-T providers. Centers also reported using ethical values for selection: (1) equal treatment: time spent on waiting list (n = 12); (2) priority to the worst-off: limited therapeutic options (n = 14), MM burden (n = 11), high Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (n = 5); (3) maximize benefit: most likely to complete apheresis (n = 13) or infusion (n = 13) or to achieve response (n = 8); and (4) social value: younger patients (n = 3). Maximizing benefit was considered the most important criterion by 10 centers. This study is the first attempt to evaluate existing issues with CAR-T access for patients with MM and the variability and challenges in patient selection. Integrating ethical resource allocation strategies, similar to those described here, into formal institutional policies would help streamline access to CAR-T therapy and protect the needs of both current and future patients and physicians.